[jbovlaste] Re: lujvo for business functions

Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: lujvo for business functions

From: "A. PIEKARSKI" <totus@rogers.com>

Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 05:24:18 -0700 (PDT)

Delivery-date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 05:25:22 -0700

Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rogers.com; s=s1024; t=1251289458; bh=oYpZCoGq2xmS5FBg/oOSa0LqeIZPOaiFUpZj4Lr8yi4=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=xxMZ32F6LWsnEuulGGjS+pvijn/NDdyYPk7JgWet9GmBsTNBGwKBF/i6yJZNZSqZMhZ3+W3ZvT6+gsvlCG1kvHo1g5ZyYBu8ttiKG32e649CsL6RARvKd0KBKS0RhJSzWkU4AfuEfWUKKxefIsOYJ/j+we6h6JgRKX7r2XRz5RM=

Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=RmHjfho289/eYn3Plnl8JdNt7G9w9qvFc50gIJw3Q27Vhhj1DTYk2+Kj2UujHmsWSWzCYx2b1sLA/MibRN6qmiyJTj/5Hg8943E0K+cZRK8BXq7GlW3IW9h80xpbVwgq/p3u5Quf1vPBYq7eV5403MepMP+r5iSefrljn+bnq5o=;

Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org

In-reply-to: <c97.4b27a875.37c5b3c7@wmconnect.com>

References: <c97.4b27a875.37c5b3c7@wmconnect.com>

Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org

Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org

From: "MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com" <MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com>
To: jbovlaste@lojban.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 5:38:15 PM
Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: lujvo for business functions

In a message dated 8/25/2009 11:37:13 Eastern Daylight Time, totus@rogers.com writes:

- - Advertising: zacnoicu'u

- - Advertisment: zacnoi

Wouldn't these two be different arguments of the same selbri?

I'm not sure what you mean.

zacnoi:

n1 zacnoi n2 n3 z2 z3

n1 is an advertisement about n2 from n3 targeting market/segment z2 with participants z3

The process of creating an ad/campaign would be nunzacnoi, but the business of

advertising (as in "BDO is in the business of advertising"), a much broader concept,

would be zacnoicu'u.

totus