[jbovlaste] Re: crab

[Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com>]

On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 5:54 AM, Remo Dentato <rdentato@gmail.com> wrote:

I'm going to use xasyjukni for crustacean (unless there are arthropods
that live in the sea) and use {cukla xasyjukni } for "crab".

(I still would have loved to use "kangre'o" or even "sartanu" as
initially proposed).

 

I may be against it, but if you want to, do it. It's your work, after all.

On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 5:29 AM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu> wrote:
>>
>> On Thursday 16 September 2010 17:13:30 Remo Dentato wrote:
>> > I had used {xasyjukni} as well but then I realized that crabs are not
>> > arachnids, they are crustacean. I guess that at the time the gismu was
>> > created, they didn't realize it.
>> >
>> > I guess it's too late now, right?
>>
>> One reason I'd like to get the gismu making program working is to make an
>> experimental gismu for "crustacean". I think that expanding "jukni" to
>> include all arachnids was correct, but expanding it to all arthropods
>> except
>> insects was wrong. The other groups of arthropods, besides those three,
>> are
>> the myriapods (for which I coined the word "sortupcinki"), the other
>> chelicerates (horseshoe crab, sea scorpion, and maybe sea spider), and the
>> extinct trilobites.
>>
>> Pierre
>
> I fully agree that {jukni} is much, much too general, and would love to have
> a gismu specifically for each class of arthopod.
>
> --
> mu'o mi'e .aionys.
>
> .i.a'o.e'e ko klama le bende pe denpa bu
>
>

-- 
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.a'o.e'e ko klama le bende pe denpa bu