[jbovlaste] Re: [jvsw] New NatLang Word accretion disk -- By VesRul

[Arnt Richard Johansen <arj@nvg.org>]

On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 02:17:47PM -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 09:26:05AM +0200, Arnt Richard Johansen
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 03:31:42PM -0600, Jonathan Jones wrote:
> > > Does jbovlaste warn about the sense field during word
> > > submission, or only on the automatic notice as below?
> > 
> > I tried that, but unfortunately no. As long as the word “accretion
> > disk; astronomy” exists, if you try to submit a definition that
> > points to just “accretion disk”, you can't get past the “Check
> > Definition” part of the submission.
> > 
> > This is a Jbovlaste bug, of course,
> 
> It's not actually; it's behaving exactly as designed.  The idea was
> that natlang words should almost always have senses, because natlang
> words are almost always polysemous.

I take that back. It's not a bug, it's a misfeature. :-)
(http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/M/misfeature.html)

> Why do you think that this behaviour is bad?

This behaviour is bad if “accretion disk” is specific enough by itself.

At the very least, I think the check should only be against natlang words that are _not_ the natlang word that is being changed. That is, if you're removing the subsense of the only entry in that natlang word family, it should be allowed.

-- 
Arnt Richard Johansen                                http://arj.nvg.org/
Public Notice as Required by Law: Any Use of This Product, in Any
Manner Whatsoever, Will Increase the Amount of Disorder in the
Universe.  Although No Liability Is Implied Herein, the Consumer Is
Warned That This Process Will Ultimately Lead to the Heat Death of the
Universe.                           --Susan Hewitt and Edward Subitzky