RE: [jbovlaste] Re: jbovlaste erroneously states original creator as the person who edited a definition

[turnip <turnip@bcpl.net>]

>===== Original Message From Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> 
=====
>On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 01:12:56PM -0400, turnip wrote:
>> to xelfanva seva'u lo prenu poi na'e selbau la gliban toi
>> go'i ji'una'iku
>
>ji'u na'i ku ki'a sai

   See refgram Chapter 15, section 10:
>Presupposition failure can be marked directly if the presupposition is overt;
>if not, one can insert a ``mock presupposition'' to question with the sumti
>tcita (selma'o BAI) word ``ji'u''; ``ji'uku'' thus explicitly refers to an
>unexpressed assumption, and ``ji'una'iku'' metalinguistically says that
>something is wrong with that assumption. (See Chapter 10.)


>
>> .i  lo ka ce'u banro je selci'i pe la lojban
>
>"(The property of growing and being someone interested in things)
>associated with Lojban."
>
>ki'a
>

 Yes.  The property of being (a-grower-and-interested-thing), associated with 
lojban.  What's wrong with that?


>> simsa lo falrenzdi


>
>zo falrenzdi na cmima la jbovlaste .i ko cuxna lo te sumti smuni ku
>gi'a pilno lo tanru
>

lo falrenzdi cu trene fo loi velfa'u joi lo linsi poi mo'iga'u lacpu ku  
mu'i lo nu zdile lo selma'e

>"fall train amusing"?  ki'a sai
>
>> lo ka ponse so'i jipno .i ui le'i jipno cu terpoi lo ka galtu
>
>le ro moi jufra cu mutce xamgu .io

ki'e .i mutce nandu fa le pu'u fanva ku mi

  (Sorry for the delay in responding... It's a Jewish holiday right now)

            --gejyspa