Re: [jbovlaste] ocellus, ommatidium, eyelet

[Michael Turniansky <mturniansky@gmail.com>]

On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu> wrote:

On Friday, January 20, 2012 12:06:23 Michael Turniansky wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu> wrote:

> > I'm thinking of "kanlysle" for "ommatidium". What do you think?
>
>   Yup, I think that would cover it.  Of course,  that would make that lujvo
> unavailable for things like rods and cones.

We could call those "kanlymivysle" ("mivysle" meaning a cell in the biological
sense). What about the other two words?

(btw, kal is the rafsi for kanla, so kalsle and kalmivsle)

for eyelet -- kalselce'u (it's a little metaphorical, since they are not organisms, per se)

for ocellus -- sapkanla

for rhabdom -- skazgasle

 

 

We have "grana" and "konju" of course, which would be understood in the
context of vertebrate vision.

Pierre
--
When a barnacle settles down, its brain disintegrates.
Já não percebe nada, já não percebe nada.

_______________________________________________
jbovlaste mailing list
jbovlaste@lojban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/jbovlaste

_______________________________________________
jbovlaste mailing list
jbovlaste@lojban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/jbovlaste