[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [jbovlaste] berbere, berberi



Jorge Llambías scripsit:

> PEGs are unambiguous by construction, they don't need to be proved
> unambiguous, since they can't fail to be unambiguous.

Yes, of course.

> Whatever issues you may have with the PEG grammar for Lojban (and I
> can think of some) they cannot be about potential ambiguities, it
> can't have any.

My point is that a PEG grammar processor does not detect LALR-n-ambiguity
in the grammar, which is not its business.  YACC does detect LALR-1-ambiguity.

-- 
John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>             http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Sir, I quite agree with you, but what are we two against so many?
    --George Bernard Shaw,
         to a man booing at the opening of _Arms and the Man_

_______________________________________________
jbovlaste mailing list
jbovlaste@lojban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/jbovlaste