[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [jbovlaste] {mumymasti} prevails over {mumyma'i}; are lujvo not canonicalized?



  A BLUFF?!?!  How dare you, sir!  They are indeed periodically swept for noncanonical forms.  The last this happened in was the Neogene Period.  When the Quaternary Period concludes, there will be another sweep.
       --gejyspa


On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Eitan Postavsky <eitanp32@gmail.com> wrote:
When you enter a word, it says "If it is a lujvo, make sure you're using the lowest scoring form of the lujvo. You're not going to get anywhere by using a different form, as the database is periodically swept for noncanonical form lujvo, and they are modified to the appropriate canonical form. (Or removed, and all related data pointed towards the canonical version, if it already exists.)". But {mumymasti} was entered in 2003 and survives, and its lowest scoring form is {mumyma'i}. Is the quoted message a bluff, then? heh.

_______________________________________________
jbovlaste mailing list
jbovlaste@lojban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/jbovlaste


_______________________________________________
jbovlaste mailing list
jbovlaste@lojban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/jbovlaste