[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[jbovlaste] Re: [jvs-watch] Per www-data : Bad NatLangWords Report

To: jbovlaste@lojban.org
Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: [jvs-watch] Per www-data : Bad NatLangWords Report
From: Arnt Richard Johansen <arj@nvg.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 09:15:37 +0100
Delivery-date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 01:17:37 -0700
Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
In-reply-to: <E1Lixg9-00016T-DZ@ec2-www1.lojban.org>
References: <E1Lixg9-00016T-DZ@ec2-www1.lojban.org>
Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org
Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i

On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 09:15:29PM +0000, www-data wrote:
> 
> 
> The following words in the given languages have a null definition *AND* a not null definition.  Please fix.

Please explain. What's a null definition?

-- 
Arnt Richard Johansen                                http://arj.nvg.org/
Att handla en kvarting på Systemet kan vara oerhört sofistikerad på ett
digitalt plan.                                    -- Z mag@zine

Follow-Ups:
- [jbovlaste] Re: [jvs-watch] Per www-data : Bad NatLangWords Report
  - From: David Gowers <00ai99@gmail.com>

References:
- [jbovlaste] [jvs-watch] Per www-data : Bad NatLangWords Report
  - From: www-data <www-data@ec2-www1.lojban.org>

Prev by Date: [jbovlaste] Re: [jvs-watch] Per www-data : Bad NatLangWords Report
Next by Date: [jbovlaste] Re: [jvs-watch] Per www-data : Bad NatLangWords Report
Previous by thread: [jbovlaste] Re: [jvs-watch] Per www-data : Bad NatLangWords Report
Next by thread: [jbovlaste] Re: [jvs-watch] Per www-data : Bad NatLangWords Report
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread