[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[jbovlaste] Re: Random thought on how to make fu'ivla
- To: jbovlaste@lojban.org
- Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: Random thought on how to make fu'ivla
- From: Daniel Brockman <daniel@brockman.se>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 12:24:44 +0100
- Delivery-date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 03:26:50 -0800
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wo4ZerjarCECctSkOq+ou72Q+TVG2umTGDyrKOMDJQ8=; b=AkBB/Z9pYQO2jqwYXpKC6ClkkKpyEY1SvBtBfk6I+xV3vL4PmkxtWcnGbiswMmbXq0 fXcNyMKMjDaBC5ZFtw8lNGHt+1GmgwEjPkfje/Zd2aUmRHJvJHeoG9lL073fySXBQ0G5 MsZMT3ECQj+ABFlrlHjnGgiM2vpVOPqCYdSVU=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=w5jZx8Uadel3CangO7Ll+yIH49oc7uPuawIgyilb/ekqvam25wiWqAYwHDf2vlP6KS +mccIOrjhalwDTsgl+vupSgXukjul3Fu4LNw0j2oCgOK8BGVsxqyKL6fSN84xaJu8+cE Hn3ApJvGyus6ZL/a27tioK6G0zJJe9SPf6vv0=
- Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
- In-reply-to: <20100111072345.GA7910@digitalkingdom.org>
- References: <20100111072345.GA7910@digitalkingdom.org>
- Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org
- Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Robin Lee Powell
<rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
>
> It seems to me that we should make fu'ivla, at least sometimes, the
> way English does: by contracting annoyingly long compound words.
>
> Example: "cellphone", which is its own word short for "cellular
> telephone" (at least), which are themselves compounds if I'm not
> mistaken. It seems to me that we could do something similar, by
> creating the crazy-long jvajvo word and then, if it's popular,
> ripping parts out in such a way as to create a *fu'ivla* rather than
> a less-jva-jvo
>
> Just a thought.
That's a very good idea, and I couldn't approve more.
This provides a middle ground between lujvo, which tend to become too
long, and fu'ivla, which are too arbitrary.
As a bonus, it blurs the lines between the different kinds of brivla,
which lines in my opinion are currently way too sharp: people seldom
talk about brivla, but often talk about gismu, lujvo and fu'ivla.
--
Daniel Brockman
daniel@brockman.se