[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What are we after?
- To: lojban-lbck@googlegroups.com
- Subject: Re: What are we after?
- From: Matt Arnold <matt.mattarn@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 00:20:28 -0400
- Authentication-results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of matt.mattarn@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.194 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=matt.mattarn@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com
- Delivered-to: phma@localhost
- Delivered-to: phma@phma.optus.nu
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:x-sender:x-apparently-to :received:received:received:received-spf:received:dkim-signature :domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:reply-to:sender:precedence:x-google-loop :mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-unsubscribe :x-beenthere-env:x-beenthere; bh=g3oYlaUzvIqW/AsMmR20Bhcz4cFAL+v6wxKjqcHfLzo=; b=3LZADO4OZ707d8px6fldOIRbaFazqMhgVmQhU8g13I0iX1Ydwm+7IW9aI6ZC4BJPQE Z0kWn5Ew+qY+HkTjOzNuSywi7uiurCjc7WrUmBT9E8Ii3jT/jcgKJ6KFEw7d6Il9yDNS AfDu6NFjxmfgHc2FRQn5EI55FkOjlNOJ1Oe3g=
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=FngvWkzvNbfqe7L24uhb6Ln8SwVPd5mfuFHK62l9a78=; b=WiYBylx0tzYXNj6OfNzozbZb4IBEiNAiIQVUV3nYniWMmpw3lvjG+Qx3I4V9hdniC9 QglNAgASA65D7/UvloeFDtwVq4dMWPLyL7WlJhlhE07Ilyop0djA0nI6GYr7ZTMVm8FR hvJOldVXEZE/JtllGMYkC40s72wrFEs51qEKs=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-sender:x-apparently-to:received-spf:authentication-results :dkim-signature:domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:reply-to:sender:precedence:x-google-loop :mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-unsubscribe :x-beenthere-env:x-beenthere; b=24VS9mxoGdXSGU+f4/Pxoeg2wn8RSLbD7eaiQb7ddP8i3blSUeLM8z3f7fWJnoTFdl 8DjvIi1nW47S6bLJ92yq5o8+A7426HJ6wVeX02tMDgWZIIDyk5eO5dkUlW4+bQAj2KIJ ch76YfM/2HLgisBGGeXuGeBTHA0pOCuliq9XM=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=beIcuzMMN2PNUh0wzD4BrBu12fQQ4FRlr//XQvtWeJCOk+MhMaa95tz2aTJERj8WWn OnpTkoEzhUQX1IWY++7YAM8nuL6BBbnVlLJ0rWeaza0R0K40ikk4p+tOuTvzqof1k2IG /RMAACXkso0fd0e4znnU+3RTakEP+tPwkdQiw=
- In-reply-to: <4ABD07E5.2020301@kli.org>
- List-help: <mailto:lojban-lbck+help@googlegroups.com>
- List-id: <lojban-lbck.googlegroups.com>
- List-post: <mailto:lojban-lbck@googlegroups.com>
- List-unsubscribe: <http://googlegroups.com/group/lojban-lbck/subscribe>, <mailto:lojban-lbck+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
- Mailing-list: list lojban-lbck@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-lbck+owner@googlegroups.com
- References: <4ABD07E5.2020301@kli.org>
- Reply-to: lojban-lbck@googlegroups.com
- Sender: lojban-lbck@googlegroups.com
Yes, I agree. I rarely use the IRC channel, but would someone here ask
kribacr to join the mailing list? -Eppcott
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Mark E. Shoulson <mark@kli.org> wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> OK. ÂSince I wasn't paying really paying attention during the flurry of
> emails about this (a case of TL;DR, which I totally do NOT promise won't
> happen again), I went to the googlegroups site and read through the
> archive. ÂHere are some of my thoughts in response to everything being
> discussed:
>
> I think we sort of need to get a little more back to earth on this
> project. ÂNot that the discussions have not been brass-tacks practical:
> you can't get more reality-based than actually starting to put together
> the database. ÂBut I think there is a lot of very lofty, far-reaching
> ideals that Lojbanists are so fond of, getting in the way of the grubby,
> impure task ahead.
>
> So, to start with the impure: *certainly* we should start by designing
> the lowest level first. ÂEven if we have the language proficiency for
> higher levels (which itself is questionable, depending on how high we're
> talking), we don't have enough (any) experience with how testing goes
> and how this will work in the community to handle anything higher than
> MAYBE three levels. ÂEven three is a little iffy.
>
> That's why I started where I did in the googledoc, to give an idea of
> what kind of proficiency we should be looking for at each level. ÂBut I
> went about it the wrong way. ÂLike everyone else, I was too caught up in
> designing the tests to pay attention to the more basic requirement of
> getting a handle on wtf we're doing here.
>
> So that's what we should do, I think. ÂTry to agree amongst ourselves in
> a more informal (but therefore understandable!) way what it is we expect
> a "Level One Laureate" to be like. ÂWhat should such a one be able to do?
>
> And we should enlist help with that also. ÂEspecially because, as
> old-timers, we forget what newcomers are like and what it's like being
> one. ÂWe need to talk to kribacr from IRC; he's spent a lot of time
> doing teaching duties on the IRC channel, and working on his order of
> presentation of concepts. ÂIf that's an order that people seem to learn
> comfortably, then that's also a good order to test people with. ÂAnd
> maybe later talk to lindar, as one of his successful students (and mine:
> I started lindar off and kribacr took over).
>
> So, to start things off, when I think of what I would see in someone who
> had completed Level One certification (and just numbering them 1, 2, 3,
> is probably best), I think of somebody who can manage short, simple
> sentences, involving simple sumti (mi, do, ti...), basic brivla (mainly
> gismu, but chosen by utility and frequency, so if there's a
> commonly-used lujvo, no problem) and 2-piece simple tanru of them, NU
> abstractors, but only one level deep, and some conversationally-relevant
> UI and COI. ÂI tried to express that in the document, but was thinking
> more in terms of test design. ÂTry looking over it with testee
> description in mind and maybe we'll be able to discuss things more
> meaningfully.
>
> There's other stuff I probably would comment on, but this post is
> already way too long. ÂLet's start with the basics and work our way up.
>
> ~mark
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJKvQfhAAoJENKD8527nYua1h0H/0+yXlU7HT+VyZg2I7NlcjAM
> 8WWfL1awl/DWTGgi2pql2U8CPz/ytJK021L4TxQuviG3DHJZQnQ8NSLFH08wgMU0
> X36J0qW7CvoCmxP+aTuYwWDPrWHuBhUma4Vj4bu93af/8t2K7+qlde9NFIzLsknU
> tG7svV1pBN6e9aw3o6NnuA3CvtqCVEoNxJvsOmdCJnzNNyWFHIvhzLtYf1rDKcpE
> 1zX4h7iniOETMkLEaXukQke+j/u2B6YyA8L673Oi+U5kS3lRJ0GmKQj0guXXTGFk
> TsaPeA801c0fCuCXPL5X8Ki9kxMoox/jijwhFFR27dqBAVHro4/b+i0wEUPAPow=
> =nLR3
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>