On 8/14/05, Chris Capel <pdf23ds@gmail.com> wrote:
First, {bo}. When you see the sequence {i PU bo}, does that mean that
bo is grouping the two bridi together, using the sense of the PU cmavo
used?
Yes, more generally any {i <tag> bo}.
Third. In {i la'e di'u no'e ba'e mutce le ka cizra}, what kind of
cadence might that be spoken with? Is stress usually put on {ba'e}, or
on the next word?
One theory is that you could/should read it in a monotone, the emphasis being
taken care of just by the presence of {ba'e}. I would emphasize the next word,
never {ba'e}.