Ühel kenal päeval (pühapäev 20 mai 2007 8:55 pm) kirjutas Vid Sintef:
> So, {mi} is a cmavo, and an article isn't required for a cmavo to be used
> as a sumti because, I suppose, cmavos don't have any place structure? But
> why are those cmavos like {mi} listed on the gismu list, then?
I have no idea why "mi" is in the gismu list, but you're a bit misguided about
cmavo. First of all, some cmavo do have place structures, but I think you
don't need to know that yet. Secondly, when you stick a cmavo into a sumti
place, it just DOESN'T HAVE an article. It's a rule. The grammar is defined
so.
Attachment:
pgpWy9boSVsoS.pgp
Description: PGP signature