Tom Sturgeon wrote: > s'oi coi fi'i > mihe t'omys mi'e timos > That is about the extent of my lojban. don't worry, the beginnings of lojban can be easily grasped if you're not as lazy as me. > I am wondering if so many questions are malformed or rendered > meaningless from a logical positivism standpoint due to the limitations > of the language. i don't understand? > I hope that learning lojban will help me organize some of my thinking, > both in lojban and English. it might give you a different perspective on english, at least it did that for me :) ---- there are, however, a few fundamental flaws in your knowledge of lojban: first: it's not s'oi, it's coi and the c makes a sound similar to the one most english "sh"'s do. second: the ' can only occur between vocals, so your cmene should be tomys not t'omys. it also completely replaces h, so it's mi'e not mihe. if you find the time you should definitly have a look at the #lojban irc channel on the freenode network! hope to see you there - Timo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature