[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban-beginners] Re: curt
- To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
- Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: curt
- From: "Jorge Llambías" <jjllambias@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 15:51:12 -0300
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=Pd5GhYJkhZ6BkizuNsXVd0tXzyuWO2HXas7kD9uWtn4=; b=kYbjstI8tmNtNXTZIlSADPMPn/1I/oKawtuL7BB5Sl6Vq3RrTIF2CVSbsUNkeqqMb4Eg+84Dhsclw+66BRV7pxcyIb0C69YhTmnDwt/4zMfSoxgJt1R3ve19fHw3mmToCFrQUgdlp/SI0Lqlt6e2HUDlZkqMioG3M75+inCZd+c=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=GM38eljlVZNPZdAN7AwrWOLoshO30fFN+u1Tw/mOrYhABfaG1vRf9eWfYG9WMPi7/X2gNEMMsyJ+pHZ4il9FWjXPaOD7WvfLPA99Saow2EvjxNrEJluNIlbfmhaqPgf0dzOCSE/4jblvI1KQJu3z3QtDU6iXZuYPn+cAMXvbfho=
- In-reply-to: <737b61f30711020958y7b7ad821k1011a80c5027c20e@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <737b61f30711020958y7b7ad821k1011a80c5027c20e@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
- Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
On 11/2/07, Chris Capel <pdf23ds@gmail.com> wrote:
> "Curt". Example sentence:
>
> Didn't you take care of this already? (IM'd to a coworker.)
>
> Is there an attitudinal (or combination) for this? I suppose "ga'i"
> might work, maybe "e'ega'i".
Indicating that you're being curt seems to go against the very
spirit of being curt, so I would suggest not using any indicator
at all. But {ga'i}, {ionai}, {o'onai}, {le'o} all might capture some
of the attitudes that could go along with curtness.
> And how would the opposite go, to
> disclaim curtness? (Over IM, you can't use tone of voice, of course.)
> I'd like an attitudinal that mean "I don't know, but"--something like
> ".uanai", but not quite, because ".ua" is "discovery", not
> "knowledge". And I suppose a simple "ga'inai" or "ga'icu'e" would do
> the trick.
Here on the other hand you can be as expansive as you want,
depending on how much deference you want to show:
{ga'inai i'o iosai o'acu'i u'ocu'i le'onai}
mu'o mi'e xorxes