[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban-beginners] Re: .uinainai??
- To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
- Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: .uinainai??
- From: Penguino <spheniscine@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 15:36:49 +0800
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=2239Q9cTtyqlyb0k8Wan0e5nnkLJl79uf16J4j9N4AY=; b=EFN3KVRFqsEzelnMy8mbzpkphxixdcPAui1CEvx61l/s9FEZz2dutKKpqZhDiVNBCWkwt9EyI6A3mJsISRIsglNg8pyWvKBCVM3kgXRQ/QLvZ7IjtoZReV0kJUeTxOFdYz1FFSYzxVDIwCuUCnbLtYtMOrRGEwQsKyOA/0Zo1mY=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=PSmg4Bp80I7tBu5U42M9Azft42FAl5i/5AY7Xj3M+vDJ+WPH04JxThBMW7GpUdZ+G4u5/BUcwSIl63WilumjB2lVnMk00z2hd81g7JGt8XwIdTbMXjHtRZUrKWTJNJbPF6m5cjGgwckTKaSFxtNTG+9m8WGzCuK+tlQqxdPMgNw=
- In-reply-to: <20080103222837.9e6eaa7z4k0sggw8@webmail.ixkey.info>
- References: <20080103222837.9e6eaa7z4k0sggw8@webmail.ixkey.info>
- Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
- Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
pe'i Since [nai] is polar negation, [.uinainai] would mean the same as [.ui], and not equivalent to English "not unhappy", which might be better expressed as [.uinaicu'i].
I have also been thinking about combinations that might not quite fit the 7-point scale, like [cu'isai] (ex. [a'ucu'isai] strong disinterest), or even [caicai], which is even stronger than [cai] (this should, of course, be used sparingly).