[lojban-beginners] Re: zo bo

["Jorge Llambías" <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On 3/31/08, Vid Sintef <picos.picos@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 8:20 PM, Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com> wrote:
> >  {ca} indicates simultaneity, not sequentiality. Did you mean
> >  {gi'e ba bo}?
>
> Yes.
> But I also wanted to mean that the event of prami is simultaneous with "now".
> Maybe {nau} is what I need?

Yes, {mi do pu nelci gi'e ba bo nau prami} would work.

> >    .i mi do ca ke ge pu nelci gi prami
>
> Why {ke}? Isn't {ge} good enough to delineate the scope to which {ca} functions?

The official grammar requires {ke}, but this is probably a remnant
of the obsolete LALR(1) requirement, so it can probably be dropped.

mu'o mi'e xorxes