[lojban-beginners] Re: plipe

["Jorge Llambías" <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On 5/21/08, komfo,amonan <komfoamonan@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> pe'i {ze'o} and {zo'i} are oddly defined. There seems to be motion in
> the definitions, which makes one wonder what happens when they get a
> {mo'i} tacked on.

"outward" and "inward" are keywords in the ma'oste, not
the definitions. The full definitions are:

ze'o: beyond/outward/receding from
zo'i: nearer than.../inward/approaching from ...

The mixing of direction and location is typical of the wording
for all FAhAs, for example:

ne'i: within/inside of/into ...
ni'a: downwards/down from ...

As I understand it, zo'i, zo'a, ze'o form a subsystem:
this-side-of ..., by ..., beyond ...

My proposed definitions in jbovlaste are:

ze'o: fi'o se ragve
zo'a: fi'o se noryragve
zo'i: fi'o se tolragve

> Also, there seems to be no FAhA for "outside"
> (opposite of {ne'i}); {ze'o} could be coopted for that.

I prefer {ne'inai} for that.

mu'o mi'e xorxes