[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban-beginners] Re: Complex Selbri
- To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
- Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Complex Selbri
- From: "LakMeer Kravid" <lakmeerkravid@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 18:36:52 +1300
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=nI+P37KVtFG2ZV+G1DWimgapv2vjNDqB9z6SUc6hn78=; b=kQqjjUv2TT/HFFZSUWs8xBi7c/1dz70cRZ31UbX95ZCVwSe4pM/dAV8T6XdA9qKvCj I9hDYmnlsjrjaO92Fc6Affs5SK8Ub/hHAwFQTJQl6rp1mmHygidc3iRD40YF5NJ5/8+q stqgjIM/f4MJAJZfgFWEB08i2P3b6AXxhGSY0=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=DggEuFX9oCviey8xNJVWaCEWc65ZM9Val9VgwGKaaEqCG+GlLZQ3S+E6opVkGd8ucG 6jTt5KgLCveCqarYLEaoiZwytRqTLScMQqMRAjH5i6pvWU/MxBXKtY40a9L5hTQoOclD wnj96mx7/jI4OnNjfANlo+MQveODS+dwnRMjQ=
- In-reply-to: <20081226012726.GC7051@sdf.lonestar.org>
- References: <49542F12.4040908@synx.us.to> <20081226012726.GC7051@sdf.lonestar.org>
- Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
- Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
I love {be}, it's incredibly useful. I also prefer it aesthetically; I often prefer {le pendo be mi} to say, {le mi pendo}, which incidentally is also less specific.
I have a quick question about {be} however:
If I wish to make the sumti "one who converses in lojban" using {be}, do I say {lo tavla be fo lo jbobau} or {lo tavla fo be lo jbobau} ?
ki'e
Lak