[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[lojban-beginners] Re: "cu" with PU

To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: "cu" with PU
From: Minimiscience <minimiscience@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 14:08:35 +0000
In-reply-to: <d41.3308b8a7.36a70e6c@wmconnect.com>
Organization: SDF Public Access UNIX System <http://sdf.lonestar.org>
References: <d41.3308b8a7.36a70e6c@wmconnect.com>
Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)

de'i li 20 pi'e 01 pi'e 2009 la'o fy. MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com .fy. cusku
zoi skamyxatra.
> Is "cu" required with PU?  I thought that "cu" with PU was redundant at best.
.skamyxatra

If you mean "{cu}" before a PU at the beginning of a main {selbri}, the Yacc
grammar does seem to indicate that the "{cu}" would be unnecessary there.

mu'omi'e .kamymecraijun.

-- 
na'e du'u mi lazni .i du'u mi na'e selra'u sa'u

References:
- [lojban-beginners] "cu" with PU
  - From: MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com

Prev by Date: [lojban-beginners] Pasporta Servo?
Next by Date: [lojban-beginners] Re: Pasporta Servo?
Previous by thread: [lojban-beginners] "cu" with PU
Next by thread: [lojban-beginners] Pasporta Servo?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread