[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban-beginners] Re: Preliminary chapter 1 for Lojban learners
de'i li 18 pi'e 03 pi'e 2009 la'o fy. MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com .fy. cusku
zoi skamyxatra.
> General question: Does "mo" have a place structure of its own?
.skamyxatra
Its place structure is that of whatever {selbri} is given as the answer.
> IOW, is "la paris. mo la frans." correct?
Syntactically, yes. "{mo}" belongs to {selma'o} GOhA and so can have zero or
more {sumti} as arguments, just like any other {selbri}.
On the topic of the tutorial, I'm really not sure whether it's correct to use
"{cmima}" to indicate that one thing is part of another. The definition in the
{gismu} list seems highly oriented around membership in mathematical sets, and
treating Europe as a set would technically require use of the very rare
"{la'i}" in place of "{la}" before "{.iurop.}." A better choice of {selbri}
would be "{pagbu}" or, as I suggested before, "{se vasru}." On the other hand,
the definition of "{cmima}" is a bit vague, and some could argue that your use
of it is acceptable.
mu'omi'e .kamymecraijun.
--
lo cevni ganai pacyzu'e gi na'e cevni vau sei sa'a la .iuripydes. cusku