[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban-beginners] la'e di'u
- To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
- Subject: [lojban-beginners] la'e di'u
- From: Luke Bergen <lukeabergen@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 00:01:16 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=GRAdpNHPRLDe0MlL4GX0IL74p/8oaWIIDtdQCQa+3fg=; b=MMOvHKTDiqzYMxLn3h1d7QwS6hsZjafzfxumtNHWtX51w0DdtU18y+BUlI264BCGk2 1zDmW1670YDCPC7J4cZjQk5GXzOa4sv/2BuDlI/Fjz8laCnw0GCp7McndM0RN68JDYab yzVOfzFsNqXMQNhLXqCREEkzt2foQ+fXYNcKE=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=DskkUdZ7tl0jh1sAbmQL0es4TSjtw5IQN/9/fmNauzMD56QTZ5pWB4IhWdLL8Njccj /ymnCwm3L6+vJtQIP97fXWRby/CEnD0SA+ls+upZVniYEDOjUv+CunM3uY5qLD8DpUi2 XMcc90BJm4FK/zJ7Q8yoYzE0r3KMQOZEEjEjE=
- Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
- Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
So the definition of "la'e" is "the referent of (indirect pointer);". This seems like a very fuzzy kind of idea. If I say "mi gleki lo nu do pu klama lo zarci" in the next utterance will "la'e di'u" refer to my happiness, me, or the event of "do pu klama lo zarci"? Would the listener just have to pick this sort of thing up from context?
- Luke Bergen