The only extent would be that they are both conlangs, developed to permit communication between persons who, while not possessing a common language, can nonetheless develop sufficient knowledge of this language to facilitate effective and disambiguous communication.
I can't otherwise see any commonalities, either, myself
Peace,
Alex.
"Oh, I love it when they /ask/ me to corrupt them ..." - Me, talking to Nai, Mar 01 2008
"You people and your quaint little categories." - Captain Jack Harkness, Torchwood
"We're grown ups now, and it's our turn to decide what that means." - Randall Munroe, http://xkcd.com
Conquer the Universe with me! See how at http://fiat-knox.livejournal.com
We are now leaving the Kingdom of Star Trek and entering normal space.
--- On Tue, 21/4/09, Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
> From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
> Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: mutuality?
> To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
> Date: Tuesday, 21 April, 2009, 8:46 PM
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 09:24:26AM -0400, Luke Bergen wrote:
> > from the wiki page for "lojban": Also Toki
> > Pona<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toki_Pona>and
> Esperanto
> > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Esperanto> have
> mutuality with
> > Lojban to some extent.
> >
> > google:define gives:
> >
> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=define%3Amutuality&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f&oq=
> >
> > So what *exactly/**specifically* is meant by
> "mutuality" in this context?
>
> I haven't the *slightest* idea. Sounds meaningless to
> me.
>
> -Robin
>
> --
> They say: "The first AIs will be built by the
> military as weapons."
> And I'm thinking: "Does it even occur to you to
> try for something
> other than the default outcome?" See
> http://shrunklink.com/cdiz
> http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ ***
> http://www.lojban.org/