[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban-beginners] Re: broda moi
- To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
- Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: broda moi
- From: tijlan <jbotijlan@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 23:02:38 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=HkMDZJ2LVq8tNlUIWDJwhHjK+SnBqHRs//O4HNrLbk8=; b=UQ2qEpt/6lmm547cdz6G8BcE9KVwFJNyvvAXs+DFN5JwinWz9C6o4ucyM5VbtARma9 obzXb+FsYXicuZF/X7hn77eYmSfdeut+34ADl61OPUe8FKULQRobIvsL1xopw7Ofknxl U4hrN3wohNx62LULEPBDWb2JZVIo8rdB5E9bc=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=cZALaHvo5Xo0jgmx4DWjCLuotItIiEbQxhcPf3QG6P83HlS2Rd4cuFmsVZ0BZspuk8 Sok4lJg4KaUTvuy4bPdaK26MlxqhIPZaBRijVOrPH8E7fKc5JsYhJK7hVJIUIvI96NYZ Jf7zenr5VZ4h1Va+mB0xTOpzKRnUVpj0Oi2FQ=
- In-reply-to: <20090531202510.GA13449@sdf.lonestar.org>
- References: <4de8c3930905311309u20c6e72xffaa964ae140d208@mail.gmail.com> <20090531202510.GA13449@sdf.lonestar.org>
- Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
- Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
2009/5/31 Minimiscience <minimiscience@gmail.com>:
> de'i li 31 pi'e 05 pi'e 2009 la'o fy. tijlan .fy. cusku zoi skamyxatra.
>> I suppose "da me lo broda moi" or "lo me lo broda moi cu brode" is
>> valid. But how about "da broda moi" or "lo broda moi cu brode"?
> .skamyxatra
>
> No. A MOI can only be preceded by a number, a {lerfu} string, or a "{me}"
> {selbri}. A bare normal {selbri} does not work.
What is the rationale for permitting {me da}, which as a whole is a
selbri, before {moi}?
mu'o mi'e tijlan