[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban-beginners] Re: inversive linking
- To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
- Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: inversive linking
- From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 14:16:05 -0300
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=VfxycdyjPGv1DAMGEUS1Un+5Xxtufh6JQKJTeuzcjQ4=; b=Bz1JYECPdotgu8FLNV809F6bKmd++5uWkmApyEb2TVw5yhdvPTGwh2uIBmPvPsQsFB iM/5YytxJXDLiBGLWoqJ3lZNQGv6Ppj4lX3hfCQmtyTCngnctj98uPx4n0kOEwba1QHn FCwG/BEbFw5I7pUgViwlQY8+VleQapoFV9z1w=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=FmK2XZouZ1yQS4fu8jxyrnp9/UplpuiixngnTq7gneJMAPa63ee7UgWyk2YeTPDamE mIcCw86SceDKfp1Jxj9vYHuaK/a472CsipAD1Nxr8jXK5B5N+lV0Vqw431j0lnJNXlrQ SrimV2lJr5Segz2nprG2m+vraXwBBRErvhyeM=
- In-reply-to: <4de8c3930906030838l589a6c78nc09084ec44853d6a@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <4de8c3930906030838l589a6c78nc09084ec44853d6a@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
- Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 12:38 PM, tijlan <jbotijlan@gmail.com> wrote:
> Wouldn't it be cool if we
> could do the following ("pe'ei" being an experimental, inversive
> version of "pe"):
>
> la .ken. pe'ei lo verba pe'ei lo plise cu gunro
If "pe'ei" is in selmaho GOI, the grouping is "la .ken. pe'ei (lo
verba pe'ei lo plise)", so you would need "la .ken. pe'ei lo verba
ge'u pe'ei lo plise" to get the right grouping.
We could also use "se pe" instead of "pe'ei", that way we don't need
to add new words for the reverse of "po" and "po'e" as well, just a
minor adjustment of the grammar.
mu'o mi'e xorxes