On Tuesday 11 August 2009 20:11:12 Joshua Choi wrote:
> I have a question on some of the cmavo's standard definitions. je'e's
> definition is "vocative: roger (ack) - negative acknowledge." ui's is
> "attitudinal: happiness - unhappiness." I'm guessing (though I don't
> know for sure) that the definitions' first parts are the real
> meanings, while their second parts are the meanings' opposites. But
> why is this necessary or why was it done like this? It was pretty
> confusing to me—is there some subtle concept that I'm unaware of?
The second part is the meaning of the word followed by "nai". So "je'enaido"