[lojban-beginners] Re: klama vs. litru

[Oleksii Melnyk <lamelnyk@gmail.com>]

"litru" is "klama" without source/destination, to use when only the
route/transport is significant. mi na'o litru lo ricfoi bai tu'a lo
tixnu -- it does not matter, where the start/finish are.
"muvdu" is harder. Right now, i think that it is about the moving
"objects", loi djacu cu muvdu lo fanmo be lo rirxe lo krasi be ri.

The difference is subtle. You, probably, can use "klama zi'o zi'o" for
"litru" and "klama fu zi'o" or "klama fu vo'a" for "muvdu".

2009/9/28, Ryan Leach <rsw.leach@gmail.com>:
> And how does muvdu enter into this little number too, since we're asking?
>
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Joshua Choi <joshua@choi.name> wrote:
>> The baseline definition of litru is: "x1 travels/journeys/goes/moves via
>> route x2 using means/vehicle x3. x1 is a traveller." klama also means "x1
>> is
>> a traveller" in the baseline, but includes two more sumti.
>>
>> When should I use litru, and when should I use klama?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> “Nothing bothers me more than sloth. The objective is to fix mistakes
> of ambition and not make mistakes of sloth. I work my ass off.”
> -Tim Ferriss
>
>
>
>


-- 
mu'o mi'e lex