[lojban-beginners] Re: using 'se' in conversation

[Jameson Orndorff <jtorndorff@gmail.com>]

{.i mi viska lo se gleki} - if you absolutely need gleki as the main selbri, then {lo se viska ku se gleki mi}. The first example will work fine. The second might not, as gleki2 is a state or event. Though I suppose technically you can see those...

{.i mi viska lo se citka} - nothing wrong with this.

mu'o mi'e .kribacr.

On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Luke Bergen <lukeabergen@gmail.com> wrote:

I think that the first one is ok, although I would tend to say {da poi mi viska cu xamgu}.  {xamgu} is good.  {gleki} is happy.

likewise, I think that the second one is ok, but again, I would find it more natural to say {mi viska da poi citka ke'a}

On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Ryan Leach <rsw.leach@gmail.com> wrote:

Are these how I would say the following
1. What I see is good
2. I see what is eaten

1. le mi se viska cu gleki
2. mi viska le se citka

If not please advise.

--
“Nothing bothers me more than sloth. The objective is to fix mistakes
of ambition and not make mistakes of sloth. I work my ass off.”
-Tim Ferriss