[lojban-beginners] Re: xorlo, lo'e, and le'e

[Joshua Choi <joshua@choi.name>]

I see—that makes sense; thanks for the answer! However, this part of
xorlo isn't really mentioned in the Wiki pages on it at all, and so
xorlo's scope seems much less general than it really is: all sumti.
Could I add what you just said to the "How to use xorlo" page in the
wiki? I'm sure it'd help other newcomers a lot.

2009/12/14 Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>:
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 10:16 PM, Joshua Choi <joshua@choi.name> wrote:
>>
>> Under the xorlo reform, the articles in the LA and LE selma'o are
>> reformed. However, two articles in LE are not mentioned at all in
>> either the informal or formal proposals of xorlo: lo'e and le'e. What
>> is the status of these cmavo after xorlo? Are they deprecated? Or are
>> they included in xorlo? Or are they unchanged?
>
> The significant point of xorlo is that sumti without an explicit outer
> quantifier are not to be taken as quantifying the bridi they appear
> in. In that sense, all sumti are affected, whether it's a sumti from
> KOhA or one headed by LE, LA, LAhE, LI, LU, ZO, etc.
>
> But other than that, I think they remain unchanged (i.e. as little
> understood as before).
>
> mu'o mi'e xorxes
>
>
>
>