[lojban-beginners] Re: Not needing terminators

[Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu>]

On Thursday 18 February 2010 20:21:23 Ian Johnson wrote:
> I put this sentence into jbofi'e and it appears to have parsed it the way I
> intended. However, when writing it, I was not sure if I needed to have a
> {kei} after {la lojban.}.

What options are you using with jbofi'e? With the -x option, it gives this:

xu /{yes/no?..}/ [([nandu2 (thing(s) hav-ing difficulty):] do /you/) /[is, 
does]/ <<se nandu /hav-ing difficulty/>> ([nandu1 (difficulty thing(s)):] 
lo /any/some/ <nu /event(s) of/ [([tavla1 (talk-er(s)):] do /you/) /[is, 
does]/ <<tavla /talk-ing/>> ([tavla2 (talked to thing(s)):] mi /I, me/) 
([tavla4 (language(s) of talk):] fo / / la / / lojban. /[NAME]/) ([tavla5 
(talk??):] lo /any/some/ <nu /event(s) of/ [([tatpi1 (tired thing(s)):] 
do /you/) /[is, does]/ <<tatpi /being tired/>>]>)]>)]

"lo nu do tatpi" is in x5 of "tavla"; the question marks mean jbofi'e doesn't 
know how to gloss that place.

Pierre
-- 
li fi'u vu'u fi'u fi'u du li pa