[lojban-beginners] Re: Not needing terminators

[Ian Johnson <blindbravado@gmail.com>]

Scratch that last bit, just saw what Jorge said.

On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 8:49 PM, Ian Johnson <blindbravado@gmail.com> wrote:
> I know; as I said I intentionally made that a bit more clunky than was
> necessary to make sure I actually knew what I was doing here. (If I
> had really wanted to practice terminators I would've put every single
> one in.) I know there are better ways to do that; just from LfB I knew
> to use cu when possible.
>
> I really like that structure, though; that's considerably better than
> the not-clunky structure that I had in mind.
>
> By the way, you changed it to "ba na'e"; is there a word order for
> this sort of thing anywhere?
>
> mu'omi'e latros.
>
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 8:28 PM, Robin Lee Powell
> <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 10:22:55PM -0300, Jorge Llambías wrote:
>>> With "na" you don't need the first "kei", as "na" will force the
>>> closing of the second "lo nu". If you go with "ba na'e nandu", I
>>> find "cu ba na'e nandu" more clear than using "kei".
>>
>> Yeah, always use cu if you can.
>>
>> -Robin
>>
>> --
>> They say:  "The first AIs will be built by the military as weapons."
>> And I'm  thinking:  "Does it even occur to you to try for something
>> other  than  the default  outcome?"  See http://shrunklink.com/cdiz
>> http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>