[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban-beginners] How versatile is "nu"?
- To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
- Subject: [lojban-beginners] How versatile is "nu"?
- From: tijlan <jbotijlan@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 12:52:38 +0000
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=I/S5oHvceqE0wU3dM6d/AQZ9qYqUHznwFjzoR7gyWOc=; b=g+eQRe7jUmNt80dK0/CurozaBkUBDjIIqzZ71boC+M5niIf3BxnAEQMl/nMVS5DgNA 4sW3VldsQEa78trLeA0vLsCiMlTom5MJMSLeztEABhHCNUc+miyuZdTQPEv4WtdeOsBP 4JPiEktmhdCRGfxA3GnfIItD/KTsxN2sbwoQ0=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; b=HywOPQmy+jGQH2eVVkhepbG2+DGSsbT7Qo6AVoOonlq/rNUetp/V4NAiClBfGBi+gK 0epQi8JeRHuiISYRX8H0Q6cq+JL73GaGXwt4TBR7oGeyIOc73GopE+hoNtvGehnTEi1J gmL93BkYPOqBV32Y0EaWTnF5yvTgiEInmjiVk=
- Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
- Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
Officially, the most generic/nonspecific of NU is "su'u"; but people
seem to use "nu" more often for the purpose of general abstraction.
Personally, I wouldn't find it particularly odd if someone use "nu"
for a terbri which the gimste defines as "du'u" or other specific
types of abstraction. For example:
mi jinvi lo du'u broda (I think that the proposition "broda" is true)
mi jinvi lo nu broda (I think that the event "broda" is true)
"jinvi"s x2 is officially to take "du'u". Is "nu" for such objects of
mental activity / logical operation discouraged? If so, why?
mu'o mi'e tijlan