[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[lojban-beginners] Re: coi?





On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 4:57 PM, A. PIEKARSKI <totus@rogers.com> wrote:
 
 
Geoffrey,
 
You'll find an explanation as to why Canada isn't {kando} here:

http://nuzban.wiw.org/archive/9110/msg00119.html
 
totus
 
 
I didn't say {kando}... at least not just now. I said {kanko}, based of the slang term Canuck. It was already explained to me why {kando} was impossible. Anyway it's probably impossible to change it now at all, so this is just idle speculation.
 
djefris.
 
>
> .i mi'e djefris. .i mi kadnu gi'e se bangu le
> glico .e le fraso .e le latmo
> to so'u toi .e le lojbo to ji'a so'u
> toi
>

  fi'i djefris.  do pamoi lo'i kadno jbopre poi se
> sanji mi .i doi
drata jbopre do'u da xu drata kadno jbopre

(Welcome,
> Geoffrey.  You are first Canadian lojbanist that I'm aware
of. 
> Hey, other lojbanists -- are there any other Candian lojbanists?)
 
You're not alone, Geoffrey.  I live in Toronto.  Welcome!

totus



Thank you! Nice to meet a fellow Canuck.
(Hmmm... if the fu'ivla for Canadian was based on Canuck it could have been kanko instead, which doesn't seem to break any rules... just idle speculation, of course.)