[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban-beginners] Re: .imu'ibo
- To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
- Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: .imu'ibo
- From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 11:12:51 -0300
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=m4/WJB9hlm24dt3Boig5wJhY9/oGNtEcPFnLSQDc4E0=; b=HMpJ7Z6jKQa6uICSTCLFpO4lt2CsCmKOWQul1OyiaYxDap27v74EKWWXGy4O4ChRei dk3FyTNj6mu4Wey7VAiNKBA61mixx0P8RT/RZgT/P+yk1XLgVYCDV8/920woVGMPxtgR rBGV3exfLx9Zh0ncCO8JOo0rmMAQJgP5eRwos=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=CbS1yL+xbA5SPwsFWRnwUoapEwHoqmasLwvpQPmexWpSjd8q8izwT8T5m1z/aYHJIC y4rDGwxatB57kMl2HHCJxtDaDlJQnZueZglPWltT4qttAQ29yY1y6UUamF5leuApUroz iuYmpwzPXOaw/w+d1vkjfA8hRPTLABUIySUqw=
- In-reply-to: <5715b9301003210025q7f680f5eo50b3e7d76c38f116@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <5715b9301003210025q7f680f5eo50b3e7d76c38f116@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
- Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 4:25 AM, Luke Bergen <lukeabergen@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've been perusing the CLL looking for an answer but haven't found a very
> clear one so I'll ask here. Does {broda .imu'ibo brode} mean "broda
> therefore (motivationally) brode" or "broda because of (motivationally)
> brode"?
The latter. It is roughly equivalent to "broda mu'i lo nu brode".
> Same question for PU.
For PU it's the other way around. "broda .ibabo brode" roughly means
"brode ba lo nu broda".
> Basically this use of {bo} confuses me in
> just about every way.
That's understandable, because the conventions for tags are not as
consistent as they should have been.
mu'o mi'e xorxes