On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Pierre Abbat
<phma@phma.optus.nu> wrote:
(Resending. First copy got lost.)
On Wednesday 16 November 2011 13:02:09 Michael Turniansky wrote:
> mi bilma fi lo vidru be fi lo galxe
>
> Or..
>
> mi bilma tu'a lo galxe lo vidru
>
> Or even....
>
> mi bilma fi lo vidru fi'o selxai lo galxe
Is "bilma fi lo vidru" correct? x3 of "bilma" is a disease, such as la
zukám .a la pelglar, both of which involve viruses, or la ceryrig .a la
skorbut, which don't have a pathogen.
Pierre
I would interpret lo vidru in that position as "lo vidru te bilma", i.e. a viral disease.
--gejyspa