Anyway, I'd like to know how do we treat such selbri. Maybe {ko'a broda be ko'e ko'i} is equivalent to {ko'a broda ko'e fe ko'i}? The latter, as far as I understand, is an awful way to say {ko'a broda ko'e e ko'i} (or maybe {ko'a broda ko'e ju'e ko'i}? I can't say I understand {ju'e} and I don't see it in CLL).
On Friday, April 27, 2012 12:40:35 PM UTC+2, ianek wrote:
In a recent thread there seemed to be an assumption that {ko'a broda be ko'e ko'i} means the same as {ko'a broda ko'e ko'i}, ie. linked sumti eliminate the filled brivla places. Where is the source of this fact? I looked into http://dag.github.com/cll/5/7/ and didn't find it.
mu'o mi'e ianek