They are talked about in the CLL here:
http://dag.github.com/cll/4/2/
But basically, the rule about parsing is that if you can take a CVV (CV'V) or, if not, a CV off the front end of a "word", leaving something that is still a word, then it DOES FALL OFF. Repeat until you can't. That's the whole reason why there exists the hyphen rules about making lujvo and fu'ivla. For example misespati -> "mi te spati". Unambiguously.
Aionys says, "
As far as I know, the only rule about cmavo clustering is that you can't do it if the combination takes the form of a gismu, lujvo, fu'ivla, or other predicate-word (brivla) "
But how can it ever? It can't.
--gejyspa
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Álvaro Vallejo
<avallejor@gmail.com> wrote:
Thank you very much to all.
All this has been an excellent Lojban lesson.
cmavo clusters should be analyzed formally somewhere (e.g. CLL or Lojban for Beginners or sort of). I'll summarize all this discussion to reuse it somewhere in the future.
.u'onai
I already had the hunch tesete was te+se+te but I was coward trying to analyze it as a bunch of conversions and trying to find some meaning.
mu'o mi'e la .albaros
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban-beginners/-/wpvmyw4Vm5MJ.