[lojban-beginners] lo nu pilno zo kakne ce'onai lo sucta

[jammyatjammy@gmail.com]

le munvelski be zo kakne du la'e zoi gy x1 is able to do/be/capable of doing/being x2 (event/state) under conditions x3 (event/state) gy .i xu zoi gy being gy nibyti'i lo du'u zo kakne kakne lo selpli secau zo nu to noi simsa nunpli fi tu'a le vi jufra toi

The description of "kakne" is "x1 is able to do/be/capable of doing/being x2 (event/state) under conditions x3 (event/state)". Does "being" imply that "kakne" can be used without "nu" after it, and instead using a simple sumti (as I did above).

Probably a simpler example is {mi kakne lo tavla be fo la lojban.} - "I can-be a talker in-language Lojban" .i xu di'u xagytadji lo nu pilno zo kakne

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban-beginners/-/MglB_9Irw54J.
 
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.