Le dimanche 7 avril 2013 16:10:25 UTC+9, la gleki a écrit :ki'e gleki for the info. My problem is however a bit different from yours.On Sunday, April 7, 2013 10:49:03 AM UTC+4, aionys wrote:On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 12:32 AM, la gleki <gleki.is...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sunday, April 7, 2013 1:29:55 AM UTC+4, guskant wrote:Le dimanche 7 avril 2013 06:12:29 UTC+9, LordDraqo a écrit :Did you try "fi la lojban ku tavla"?I don't need to try it, but {fi la lojban ku tavla} means "talk about Lojban". I meant {fiku} with no sumti should be x3, and a terbri next to it should be x4, but jbofi'e doesn't parse it as I expected.I was wondering about that in past as well. I can't find that thread now but the funny thing is that{fizo'e la lojban tavla} does what you need.{la.lojban. ve tavla}andso does{fo la.lojban. tavla}I guess guskant is searching for stylistic diversity which is indeed present here.Likein {fizo'e la lojban tavla} {la lojban} is tavla4.But in {fizo'e tavla la lojban} {la lojban} is now tavla2 !!!BTW, here is the old thread https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lojban/ZBpL4xoUwgQ/discussion
From your problem, I see jbofi'e forgets the places assigned by FA when a selbri appears, and after the selbri, the default place structure is applied. I would like to say it bothers mi'a who are not familiar with European languages and should be a bug, but my actual point is something other.
According to jbofi'e, {fi ku la lojban tavla} means "Lojban is talker."
Even if {fi ku} doesn't mean /anything/, it is not a valid reason for ignoring the usual rule "that after a FA-tagged sumti, any sumti following it occupy the places numerically succeeding it, subject to the proviso that an already-filled place is skipped" described in CLL9.3.
Even {fi zi'o la lojban tavla} is parsed as "talk in Lojban" that I expected. Why not {fi ku}?