[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban-beginners] Allowing empty {soi}



so what would the behavior be if you had more or less than 2 sumti?  i.e. what is the meaning of "mi soi klama", "soi klama", or "soi klama fa mi lo zarci lo zdani"?

Can you make a little bit more clear what your suggestion/proposal is?

On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Miles Forster <m3o@plasmatix.com> wrote:
Today I thought it would be very useful to allow {soi} to be filled by zero sumti, instead of the current minimum of one sumti.

Then, we can just say {.i mi soi viska do} "I see you and you see me" -> "We see each other.", which is much shorter and actually not very ambiguous either, since there are only two sumti in this bridi anyway.

Would there be any hidden ramifications if we allowed this?

--
/p4a ja ma%sam ni"dZwanja-\e ta %bja Z mu "karu/
/bja "dZi:wan i kwa "ZwEja ta Z mu "karu/

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.