I think they are, because that other thing, the thing I described, is a relevant possibility in this discussion in general. Plus, {cevni zasti djuno tolcu'i krici} and {cevni zasti tolcu'i djuno krici} yield lujvo of essentially the same length--you don't need ke/ke'e or bo.
mu'o mi'e .latros.On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 10:52 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
I forgot that part in the lujvo. Oops.
Right, (((god existence)(impossible knowing))belief). Lujvo don't /have/ to include the rafsi for every gismu in the source bridi. I left out the tanru-super -scope cmavo in the tanru because I couldn't remember it and didn't think they were vitally needed for understanding.
On Feb 19, 2011 6:45 PM, "Ian Johnson" <blindbravado@gmail.com> wrote:
Where'd tolcu'i go?
Also, if you look at the tanru grouping, you have:
(((god-kind-of-exist)-kind-of-impossible)-kind-of-know)-kind-of-believe
which seems to be "believe that you can know that it's impossible for a god to exist", to me. {cevni zasti djuno tolcu'i krici} seems like the right tanru, with the lujvo changing analogously.
mu'o mi'e .latros.> cevni zasti tolcu'i...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.