When one english word is as overloaded as "agnostic" seems to be, it makes me question if such a thing should be expressible in lojban with a single word.
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 12:05 AM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
In tanru yes, but not in a lujvo.The meaning of lujvo is NOT defined as exactly the meaning of the tanru formed from the valsi of the component rafsi.
Especially with ready long lujvo, it is not only permissible, but encouraged to leave out non-vital rafsi.
Sent from my Android.
On Feb 19, 2011 9:40 PM, "Ian Johnson" <blindbravado@gmail.com> wrote:
I think they are, because that other thing, the thing I described, is a relevant possibility in this discussion in general. Plus, {cevni zasti djuno tolcu'i krici} and {cevni zasti tolcu'i djuno krici} yield lujvo of essentially the same length--you don't need ke/ke'e or bo.
mu'o mi'e .latros.On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 10:52 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
> Right, (((god existence)(impossible knowing))belief)....>
> I forgot that part in the lujvo. Oops.
>--> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" g...--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.