On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Michael TurnianskyDo you agree that "ro prenu cu xebni mi" is equivalent to "ro da poi
<mturniansky@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> roda su'ode zo'u ganai da taxfu gi de ka'e dasni da
> (true or false, the claim "everything that is a garment must be potentially
> wearable by something" is an example where roda has its intended use)
prenu cu xebni mi"?
Do you agree that they are also equivalent to "ro da zo'u ganai da
prenu gi da xebni mi"?
If you do, I don't see what distinction you want to make between
universal claims that use a bindable variable and those that don't.
The bindable variable "da" is the least important part of those
claims, it's just used for bookkeeping, it has no content of its own.
The content is in the predicates and the quantifier.
mu'o mi'e xorxes
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.