On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 8:51 PM, Pierre Abbat
<phma@phma.optus.nu> wrote:
On Friday 06 May 2011 18:12:05 Jorge Llambías wrote:
> "lo no gerku" is self-contradictory, it's nonsense. You are making a
> reference to something and at the same time saying that the number of
> referents is zero. It can only work in a metaphorical sense. "lo no
> gerku cu blabi" does not mean "no gerku cu blabi".
What about "ro lo no prane ke xirdegmei namcu cu gumpilji lo su'o so ficysi'u
namcu"? ("xirdegmei" is opposed to "landegmei".) It has been proved that they
must have at least nine different factors, that they are not divisible by
105, etc.; but no one has found a single one, and some mathematicians suspect
they don't exist.
Pierre
--
.i toljundi do .ibabo mi'afra tu'a do
.ibabo damba do .ibabo do jinga
.icu'u la ma'atman.