[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban-beginners] A problem with cu
coi rodo (or is simply {coi} better?)
After some Lojban lessons I have still some problems with {cu}. As far
as I understand it {cu} indicates that the following word is a selbri.
It separate two gismu:
{le nanmu cu klama}
OK, but why do you use {cu} in the following sentence:
{lenu mi cilre fi la lojban. cu xamgu mi}
{xamgu} is a selbri, so you can use {cu}, but is
{lenu mi cilre fi la lojban. xamgu mi}
correct? {la lojban.} is a cmeme - there is no need for a {cu}?
Another {cu}-problem:
{la daucac. tcika lenu mi klama}
is OK. If you want to use {se} it becomes something like
{lenu mi klama cu se tcika la daucac.}
Why is {se} not enough to separate {klama} and {tcika}?
mu'o mi'e .iens.gutsait. (or is mi'e ... enough? What is the
difference?)