[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[lojban-beginners] Re: Anyone there?

To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org
Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Anyone there?
From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 11:35:32 -0700
In-reply-to: <537d06d004081721346545c866@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1090965878.19576.201198081@webmail.messagingengine.com> <000001c484a5$26fe0b30$f004883e@crh37> <20040817221623.GO3538@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <537d06d004081721346545c866@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org
Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i

On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 06:34:05AM +0200, Philip Newton wrote:
> I've always used {mu'o} in my emails, if I use a Lojbanic salutation
> at all. Would you say that {fe'o} is preferable?

No, I agree with your arguments.  It was just interesting to see it
used.

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/
Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!"

References:
- [lojban-beginners] Yet another beginner
  - From: adonis_@fastmail.fm
- [lojban-beginners] Anyone there?
  - From: "Chris Howlett" <chris@balcomie.freeserve.co.uk>
- [lojban-beginners] Re: Anyone there?
  - From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
- [lojban-beginners] Re: Anyone there?
  - From: Philip Newton <philip.newton@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: [lojban-beginners] Re: Anyone there?
Next by Date: [lojban-beginners] Re: Anyone there?
Previous by thread: [lojban-beginners] Re: Anyone there?
Next by thread: [lojban-beginners] Re: Anyone there?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread