Stephen Weeks wrote:
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 00:05:51 -0800, Starling <pubsynxj8jw@pacbell.net> wrote:Hmm... I really shouldn't... but... {pikachu} farvi {raichu} {pichu} {thunder stone}?Nope. At no point in time does a pikachu exist as a thunder stone. a true statementwould be the following: farvi {raichu} {pichu} {pikachu}
Thanks, I thought x4 ("through stages x4") meant "by means x4." I have no idea why. Definitely ought to go finish that lojban reference one of these days. .o'anai