[lojban-beginners] language useful?

[MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com]

In a message dated 2005-02-14 5:23:46 AM Eastern Standard Time, Bruce Webber
bruce@brucewebber.com via ecartis@digitalkingdom.org writes:


> For a language to be useful, it's structure must match the structure of 
> the world being described. 


That's simply the most amazingly false statement I've seen in a long time.
*No* language structure matches or *can* match the structure of the world being described.  It's comparing apples and oranges; they're totally different, incompatible structures.  

Having said that though, can you support it with examples?

stevo