[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[lojban-beginners] Re: [lojban] Re: Denoting counterfactual sentences in Lojban?

To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org
Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: [lojban] Re: Denoting counterfactual sentences in Lojban?
From: Matt Arnold <mattarn@123.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 10:56:38 -0400
In-reply-to: <20050408232158.GQ26545@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
References: <20050408204144.GC26545@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <JNEIJCJJHIEAILJBFHILAECCEHAA.ben@goertzel.org> <20050408232158.GQ26545@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org
Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org

When a root word has more than one abbreviated form, is there ever a rationale to use one and not the other in a particular compound word? The only reason I have ever thought of was to prevent unpronouncable consonant combinations.
- epkat

_______________________________________________________
Sent through e-mol. E-mail, Anywhere, Anytime. http://www.e-mol.com

Follow-Ups:
- [lojban-beginners] Rafsi question; was Denoting counterfactual sentences in Lojban?
  - From: Adam COOPER <adamgarrigus@gmail.com>
- [lojban-beginners] Re: [lojban] Re: Denoting counterfactual sentences in Lojban?
  - From: "Adam D. Lopresto" <adam@pubcrawler.org>
- [lojban-beginners] Re: [lojban] Re: Denoting counterfactual sentences in Lojban?
  - From: Yann Le Du <yann.ledu@noos.fr>

Prev by Date: [lojban-beginners] Re: Lojbanists in Oxford
Next by Date: [lojban-beginners] Rafsi question; was Denoting counterfactual sentences in Lojban?
Previous by thread: [lojban-beginners] Re: Lojban
Next by thread: [lojban-beginners] Rafsi question; was Denoting counterfactual sentences in Lojban?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread