[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[lojban-beginners] Re: zgana, viska, catlu

To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org
Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: zgana, viska, catlu
From: jkominek@miranda.org
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 08:52:10 -0600
Accept-language: jbo, en
In-reply-to: <2d3df92a0508190134363dd206@mail.gmail.com>
References: <2d3df92a0508190134363dd206@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org
Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i

On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 10:34:35AM +0200, HeliodoR wrote:
> Having an extra gismu for versions of a word seems pointless to me.

The gismu were chosen to be convenient. Eliminating all overlap was
not a design goal.

-- 
Jay Kominek <jkominek@miranda.org>

References:
- [lojban-beginners] zgana, viska, catlu
  - From: HeliodoR <exitconsole@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: [lojban-beginners] Re: zgana, viska, catlu
Next by Date: [lojban-beginners] Re: zgana, viska, catlu
Previous by thread: [lojban-beginners] Re: zgana, viska, catlu
Next by thread: [lojban-beginners] Re: zgana, viska, catlu
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread