[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban-beginners] Re: Why 16
- To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org
- Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Why 16
- From: "la cuncuxnas." <thatskotkid@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 12:21:39 -0400
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Ms0DGWirIzPEHvXNTq+Z+qqEnbZvZX3DnKWcdksmZt3APqiTV5QPH5ZZ75566ZZMGbiVB8SJgvgFomaib0TX4a/EJ5XWYGjWcuuLygIRgOszdjQFzEBUxbE5oJVjORsYbAIKMNIv40e0Kjwe3Ky8tJxX5hgVh8KlqwhONqo65hU=
- In-reply-to: <A48849B31C98424CBB31A5E6C7D091E60230C862@wobsem03.de.gedas-grp>
- References: <A48849B31C98424CBB31A5E6C7D091E60230C862@wobsem03.de.gedas-grp>
- Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org
- Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org
Heh. It's apparently a popular issue, Lojbanizing Scott.
Depending on your pronunciation, {skot} or {skat} are the way to
go. But that kind of thing can get boring, considering the ridiculous
number of ways to make a name for yourself in Lojban. (But then,
I'm a bit biased, having just finished the section in CLL about
names.) Speaking of which: looking in the CLL, there's a quirky
little rule about consonant pairs. Specifically, "It is forbidden
for both consonants to be drawn from the set 'c', 'j', 's', 'z'."
Given the difficulty in pronouncing {scot}, I can see why!
mu'omi'e cuncuxnas.
On 8/22/05, Newton, Philip <Philip.Newton@gedas-onsite.de> wrote:
Scott Weller sigged:
> mu'o mi'e scot
Are you sure you want {scot} and not {skot}? {scot} seems a bit difficult to
pronounce.
mu'o mi'e .filip.